Generally, aspects of academic integrity issues are also presented. In this context, various references to plagiarism, cheating and misconduct are encountered. The relevant international bibliography is found to offer a great majority of articles examining various aspects of this subject with emphasis on plagiarism and other academic dishonest practices. Thus, historians may gain a better insight into the subject if they follow this trend.
One can trace a similar attitude among other researchers working on relevant topics between 18: if they name anyone responsible for introducing animal electricity as experimentally supported concept, it is Galvani. What these two authors debated was the origin and properties of particular animal currents. Given a "decisive" demonstration of the existence of animal electricity. However, neither Matteucci nor Du Bois-Reymond ever claimed to have
Since the "demonstration" of the existence of animal electricity is usually attributed to Carlo Matteucci and Emil Du Bois-Reymond, they are also given credit for "establishing" this concept. In this paper both "demonstration" and "establishment " refer to opinion expressed by a number of contemporary scientists. "establishment " follows a "demonstration" of a theory. This concept was first conceived before Galvani, and this paper deals with its "establishment." Usually. However, this paper is devoted to animal electricity per se, a scientific concept of electricity inherent in animal bodies. When the name of Galvani appears alongside the term "animal electricity" readers usually expect another discussion of the debate between Galvani and Volta in the 1790s.
0 kommentar(er)
